Note: Set to disabled for now (as of December 24, 2024)

2024-10-27


Answer:

Data ingestion’s tricky. Real-time data ingestion is even trickier. I think I’d set up some workflows set up on triggers and callbacks.

I’m imagining a process where, for example, I have a bunch of lambdas that I can invoke as needed. The lambdas can then process batches and hand them off to a streaming service, or if we don’t need to run transformations, we can directly move them to the storage layer.

Real time jobs will likely need some form of load-balancing, and I think this can be best done via some queues. We can have queue listeners that are able to pick tasks out of the queue and start processing. If we have a need for real-time, then we can scale up our worker pool when we get bursts of traffic (in the case of lambda, though, I’m sure there’s an easy way to set up horizontal scaling).


2024-10-27 (Manual Generation, for testing)


Answer:


2024-10-28


Answer:

As the hint says, I need to consider scalability and high availability. At the data layer, that means that we may not be strongly consistent, which I think is okay.

We could use a scalable noSQL database that allows for storage of user entities and their permissions. A permissions service will be created atop this database that allows for CRUD behavior, but also is accessed whenever some action is being made by a user.

CRUD operations should be straightforward, in the sense that they correspond to operations with the corresponding record in our noSQL store. However, the permissions service’s validation service will need to be highly available and quick to evaluate. This is because every accessor call will go through this service. To do so, I’d make sure I’m using a horizontally scalable design for this permissions validation service. Whenever there’s a burst in traffic, we can horizontally scale and handle more requests. Ideally, we want to keep the runtime of this low because the validation will be hit as a part of another flow.

Notes After Grading My Answer

  • I should’ve mentioned the different types of authentication standards and protocols, like OAuth or JWT
  • I should’ve mentioned caching as an option for quickness. Since we established that we don’t need consistency but do need quickness, this could be a great addition to the current solution.
  • Straight from chatgpt: “Since this is an e-commerce platform, addressing security best practices (e.g., encrypted storage, multi-factor authentication, rate limiting) and compliance (e.g., GDPR) would add depth.”

2024-10-29


Answer:


2024-10-30


Answer:


2024-10-31


Answer:

Honestly, not 100% sure, but here’s my attempt. I think importance for this question / problem comes from availability and ability to handle scale.

For availability, we want to be able to have multiple load balancers. If we’re using a single load balancer for everything, a second one must be able to replace it in case of failure. We could create tiers of load balancers where one routes requests to others if need be.

For handling scale, I think caching is a really useful hint. The load balancers may be able to send back requests they have already seen. This could be implemented with a cache within the load balancer (not really sure if this is the right approach), or as a small cache service layer that responds with whether or not something’s in the cache.


2024-11-01


Answer:

This, to me, is equivalent to “how would you handle a burst of traffic for a system that relies on ACID transactions?”

I’d consider the CAP theorem at first here. If we have the need for transactions, then that means we need data consistency. The question is, do we highlight partition fault tolerance or availability for the next option. Alternatively, we don’t need to keep everything on the same guarantees. The transactions system could be on a different DB than the other stuff.

That’s thoughts about the data layer, but in terms of actual usage from the end customer, it’s all about making their requests as fast as possible. Content delivery networks will be used to serve things like product thumbnail images, and other static content, because we know that these items are unlikely to change. Load balancers are a must to handle the bursts of traffic. I’d also mention that there’s an importance in horizontal scaling for this system. Bursts mean that there’s going to be the need to serve more traffic, and the ideal way to do this is to spin up more workers / server nodes that are able to handle the traffic.

Caching is also useful, and I’m going to tie that into an example of something that’s been showing up on websites lately. If there’s a chat bot or an “ask ai” type tooling on the website (about products, reviews, etc.), then there’s a high likelihood that caching the responses for some of these questions could be very useful in saving API call money too.


2024-11-02


Answer:


2024-11-03


Answer:


2024-11-04


Answer:


2024-11-05


Answer:


2024-11-06


Answer:


2024-11-07


Answer:


2024-11-08


Answer:


2024-11-09


Answer:


2024-11-10


Answer:


2024-11-11


Answer:


2024-11-12


Answer:


2024-11-13


Answer:


2024-11-14


Answer:


2024-11-15


Answer:


2024-11-16


Answer:


2024-11-17


Answer:


2024-11-18


Answer:


2024-11-19


Answer:


2024-11-20


Answer:


2024-11-21


Answer:


2024-11-22


Answer:


2024-11-23


Answer:


2024-11-24


Answer:


2024-11-25


Answer:


2024-11-26


Answer:


2024-11-27


Answer:


2024-11-28


Answer:


2024-11-29


Answer:


2024-11-30


Answer:


2024-12-01


Answer:


2024-12-02


Answer:


2024-12-03


Answer:


2024-12-04


Answer:


2024-12-05


Answer:


2024-12-06


Answer:


2024-12-07


Answer:


2024-12-08


Answer:


2024-12-09


Answer:


2024-12-10


Answer:


2024-12-11


Answer:


2024-12-12


Answer:


2024-12-13


Answer:


2024-12-14


Answer:


2024-12-15


Answer:


2024-12-16


Answer:


2024-12-18


Answer:


2024-12-19


Answer:


2024-12-20


Answer:


2024-12-21


Answer:


2024-12-22


Answer:


2024-12-23


Answer:


2024-12-24


Answer: